Joshua Zadro, University of Sydney; Brooke Nickel, University of Sydney; Giovanni E Ferreira, University of Sydney; Mary O’Keeffe, University of Sydney, and Tessa Copp, University of Sydney
There are many factors that influence whether you choose to have surgery for a health condition.
But one you might not have considered is the very name your doctor uses to describe your condition can make you more or less likely to go under the knife, according to a growing body of research.
This is concerning because there are often less invasive options than surgery that are equally effective and safer.
What’s in a name?
Let’s take shoulder pain as an example.
Three of us (Joshua, Mary and Giovanni) published new research last week finding health professionals’ use of certain medical terms might be encouraging patients to say yes to unnecessary shoulder surgery.
Our world-first trial involved 1308 people from five countries, some with and without shoulder pain, who were randomly allocated to read one of six hypothetical scenarios. The only difference between the scenarios was the medical term used by the health professional to describe the person’s shoulder pain.
In our study, we used the most common type of shoulder pain where people feel pain at the front of one of their shoulders which is made worse by lifting the arm and lying on it.
Shutterstock
Health professionals use a variety of terms for this pain, including “subacromial impingement syndrome”, “rotator cuff tear”, “bursitis”, and “rotator cuff related shoulder pain”.
The terms doctors use vary so widely because it’s currently impossible to pinpoint the exact cause of most shoulder pain, even with the help of sophisticated technology such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
We found people told they had a “rotator cuff tear” wanted shoulder surgery the most. Those told they had “bursitis” (inflammation of a fluid-filled sac in the shoulder) wanted surgery the least. People told they had a rotator cuff tear had 24 per cent higher perceived need for surgery than those told they had bursitis.
Unnecessary shoulder surgery is a growing problem
The use of surgery for common types of shoulder pain is increasing worldwide, including in Australia.
Yet some shoulder surgery provides limited benefit to patients. One such example is a type of surgery called “subacromial decompression”, which involves reducing pressure on a tendon by removing surrounding tissue. This procedure is no better than placebo surgery (where patients were put to sleep and researchers only conducted a joint examination, rather than surgery).
Other surgeries to repair torn tendons provide little or no benefit compared with non-surgical treatments such as exercise.
Also, there’s no reliable way to determine that a rotator cuff tear is the cause of a patient’s symptoms. Up to 21 per cent of people aged 30-39 years who don’t have any shoulder symptoms have rotator cuff tears when they are scanned.
More than 20,000 potentially unnecessary shoulder surgeries are performed in Australia each year, which we estimate to cost over $200 million per year.
Use of surgery is also increasing across many other conditions. For example, knee reconstructions for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures, and spinal fusions for some spinal conditions. However, evidence suggests surgery is not superior to non-surgical management for either of these surgeries.
What about other conditions?
Our study adds to increasing evidence showing the name your doctor uses to describe your condition can encourage you to consider unnecessary treatments.
Low-risk ‘cancer’
There’s a type of abnormal breast cell that can build up in the milk ducts called ductal carcinoma in situ. For many people, these cells are low risk and won’t grow, or grow so slowly they’ll never cause harm.
Using the terms ‘cancer’ or ‘carcinoma’ to describe this condition elicits strong negative reactions from patients, and increases their desire for more aggressive treatments, including surgery.
For patients with these low-risk cells, surgery, radiotherapy and/or hormonal treatments may not improve overall survival. Instead, these interventions may cause harm through surgical complications such as persistent pain or skin burns, as well as financial costs and the psychological impact of being diagnosed with ‘cancer’.
Acid reflux
One study asked parents to consider a hypothetical scenario in which their otherwise healthy infant cries a lot and “spits up excessively”.
It found parents who were told their child had gastroesophageal reflux disease (commonly known as acid reflux) were more interested in medication compared to parents who didn’t receive a diagnosis at all. This was true even when parents were told medication wasn’t beneficial. Medication in babies shows no difference to placebo in reducing these symptoms.
Shutterstock
‘Pink-eye’
A similar study presented a hypothetical scenario to parents about viral conjunctivitis. One group of parents were told their kids had pink-eye (conjunctivitis), and another were told their kids had an eye infection.
Parents told their children had pink-eye remained interested in antibiotics despite being told the medications were ineffective. Conversely, parents told their children had an eye infection became significantly less interested in antibiotics when told they were ineffective.
Parents given the pink-eye label perceived the infection as more contagious than those given the eye infection label, even though both are simply other ways of saying conjunctivitis.
Polycystic ovary syndrome
This is a common hormonal condition affecting many women. But symptoms are on a spectrum of severity, with no clear line separating normal from abnormal.
One study found young women told their symptoms indicated polycystic ovary syndrome – in a hypothetical scenario of a doctor’s visit – were more likely to want further medical testing than those given the term hormonal imbalance. These women also perceived their condition to be more severe and had lower self-esteem.
What should health professionals do?
It’s vital health professionals consider whether the terms they use to describe a condition might be causing unnecessary fear and anxiety, and leading patients to consider unnecessary tests and treatments.
Health professionals may find it challenging to avoid terms they’ve been using for many years. But the potential cost of increasing patient’s fear and anxiety, and making people feel they need surgery when they don’t, cannot be ignored.
Changing how health professionals describe conditions to their patients is a simple strategy that could curb the rise of unnecessary healthcare.
For patients with shoulder pain not caused by severe trauma, we suggest health professionals avoid telling patients they have rotator cuff tears as this may make some patients think shoulder surgery is needed (which it isn’t).
Health professionals could instead label people with this type of shoulder pain as having bursitis (inflammation), as this was the label that mostly made people think surgery was unnecessary.
Joshua Zadro, NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellow, University of Sydney; Brooke Nickel, NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellow, University of Sydney; Giovanni E Ferreira, Postdoctoral research fellow, University of Sydney; Mary O’Keeffe, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Sydney, and Tessa Copp, Postdoctoral research fellow, University of Sydney
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.
Have you ever chosen what you think (in hindsight) may have been unnecessary surgery? Why not share your thoughts in the comments section below?
If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.
